Chapter 03 – Ethics, Social Responsibility, and Sustainability
contractors”, which exposes MNCs to more problems.
Moreover, even if MNCs find a legal loophole to continue to classify their foreign
workers as independent contractors, this will not shield their public image and
3. Do you think statements by companies that describe good social and moral conduct
in the treatment of their workers are part of the image those companies create and
therefore are part of their advertising message? Do consumers judge companies and
base their buying decision on their perceptions of corporate behavior and values? Is
the historic “made in” question (e.g. “Made in the USA”) now being replaced by a
“made by” inquiry (e.g., “Made by Company X” or “Made for Company X by
Company Y”)?
Answer: Since awareness and expectations of corporate social responsibility are on
the rise, good social and moral conduct will be an increasingly important criterion
in consumers’ purchasing decisions. Therefore, it is legitimate to consider these
statements as advertising messages. Moreover, companies have found that their
ingredients with certain countries are also likely to persist (e.g., Italian leather,
Brazilian coffee, Egyptian cotton, etc.). However, there is likely to be an integration
of where a product is made with which company is making it and how it is being
made, as viewed in Nike and many other cases.
4. Given the principles noted in the case, how can companies comment on their
positive actions to promote human rights so that consumers will think well of them?
Would you propose that a company (a) do nothing, (b) construct a corporate code of
ethics, or (c) align itself with some of the universal covenants or compacts prepared
by international agencies?
Answer: There are two sets of interrelated considerations involved in this issue:
3-14