15. In the Enron case the company eventually turned to “back-door” guaranteeing of
the Chewco, one of its SPE, to satisfy equity investors. Assume that one guarantee
was for a $16 million loan. The loan agreement required that Enron stock should
not fall below $40 per share. If the share price did decline below that trigger
amount, either the loan would be called by the bank or the bank could choose to
increase the guaranteed number of Enron shares based on the new price (assume
$32). If the bank decides to increase the number of shares guaranteed, what would
be: (1) the original number of shares in the guarantee and (2) the new number of
shares? Why would it be important for Enron to disclose information about the
guarantee in its financial statements?
By guaranteeing the SPE’s debt, Enron was still at risk for repayment of the SPE’s doubt thereby
failing to transfer the risk. At a minimum, the situation should have been fully disclosed in the
In the example originally given, Enron would have pledged 400,000 shares of stock at $40 per
share to collateralize the $16 million loan. When the share price was reset to $32 per share,
16. On August 9, 2005, a special committee comprised of two independent
directors of Krispy Kreme (the “Special Committee”) presented a report
of its investigation into an accounting fraud to the board of directors.
The following numbers were included in the Krispy Kreme Special
Committee report with respect to reversals of accruals during the