Young that was undergoing an inspection in accordance with PCAOB’s enforcement
program. The Board found that E&Y and its partners failed to sufficiently audit key
assumptions and placed undue reliance on management’s representation that those
assumptions were reasonable. Further, the firm failed to properly evaluate a material
departure from GAAP in the company’s financial statements — its sales returns reserve.
PCAOB Chairman, James R. Doty, was quoted as saying: “The auditor’s job is to exercise
professional skepticism in evaluating a public company’s accounting and in conducting its
audit to ensure that investors receive reliable information, which did not happen in this
case.”
Following the audits and PCAOB inspection of EY’s audit of Medicis, the company
corrected its accounting for its sales returns reserve and filed restated financial statements
with the SEC.
What is the link between professional skepticism and Josephson’s Six Pillars of Character
that were discussed in Chapter 1? Given the limited information, which rules of professional
conduct in the AICPA Code were violated by EY? Explain why.
Professional skepticism relates to Josephson’s pillars of trustworthiness, honesty, integrity, reliability, and
responsibility. An auditor that approaches an audit with professional skepticism is being careful,
Given the limited information, it seems possible EY violated the following rules from the AICPA Code:
independence (rule 101), integrity and objectivity (rule 102), due care and competency (rule 201),
compliance with standards (rule 202), accounting principles (rule 203), and acts discreditable (rule 501).