Straight Voting: With straight voting each candidate for the board is elected individually. In
straight voting a majority shareholder can always elect the entire board. Control is often possible
with less than a 50% majority because less than 40% of possible votes are typically cast at
corporate meetings. Stockholders can allow someone else to vote their shares by signing a
proxy statement and Internet proxy voting is now beginning to grow. Internet based voting is
an encouraging trend. Far too many shareholders do not vote their shares, nor respond to
challenges to management by active shareholders. Consequently, most shareholder initiatives
are defeated unless they have management’s support regardless of the merits of the initiative.
Unfortunately the default is straight voting for companies chartered in Delaware. The initiation
charter must specify cumulative voting in Delaware. This is a major reason why about 50% of
firms are incorporated in Delaware.
Cumulative Voting versus Straight Voting Example
One can calculate the number of shares needed (Np) to elect p board members under cumulative
voting. If there are k directors up for election under cumulative voting a minority shareholder
would have to own or control [1 / (k+1) * # shares outstanding] +1 to ensure that the shareholder
will be able to elect one board member (p = 1).1 Under straight voting a shareholder would have
to own or control 50% of shares outstanding + 1 share (assuming that all shares are voted). For
example if there are 1 million shares outstanding and there are k = 4 director spots up for election
with cumulative voting. The minority shareholder must own or control Np = [((1 / (4+1)) * 1
million] + 1 = 200,001 shares to ensure board representation. Under straight voting the
shareholder would have to own or control 50% + 1 = 500,001 shares. In the latter case the
shareholder would elect the entire board winning in each of 4 separate elections.
b. Preferred Stock
Preferred stock has some features similar to common stock and some features similar to bonds.
For instance, preferred stock represents an ownership claim in the firm and it is a residual claim
in the event of bankruptcy, senior only to common stock. Preferred stock normally pays a fixed
dividend amount. The dividend is fixed like the coupon on a bond, but preferred stockholders
cannot sue the corporation for non-payment of the dividend. Like common dividends, preferred
dividends are not tax deductible to the firm.
Teaching Tip: At times preferred stock dividend yields have been quite favorable compared to
current yields on bonds and certainly dividend yields on stocks, but an investor in preferreds
should not expect any capital gains. In the low interest rate, poor stock performance
environment of the early 2000s, high yield preferreds were one of the few standard financial
assets to earn a reasonable rate of return.
Types of preferred stock
Nonparticipating preferred stock (typical): The dividend is not affected by the firm’s
profitability.
Participating preferred stock: The preferred stockholders may receive a special dividend if
corporate profits are high enough in a given year.
Cumulative preferred stock (typical): If one or more preferred dividends are missed, no
common dividends may be paid until the preferred dividends in arrears are first paid. Under
1 See Essentials of Corporate Finance, Ross, Westerfield, and Jordan, Chapter 7.