9. If there were no FIs then the users of funds, such as corporations in the economy, would have to approach the
savers of funds, such as households, directly in order to fund their investment projects and fill their borrowing needs.
10. There are at least three reasons for this. First, once they have lent money in exchange for financial claims,
suppliers of funds need to monitor or check the use of their funds. They must be sure that the user of funds neither
absconds with nor wastes the funds on projects that have low or negative returns. Such monitoring actions are often
extremely costly for any given fund supplier because they require considerable time, expense, and effort to collect
this information relative to the size of the average fund supplier’s investment.
11. A suppler of funds who directly invests in a fund user’s financial claims faces a high cost of monitoring the fund
user’s actions in a timely and complete fashion after purchasing securities. One solution to this problem is for a large
number of small investors to place their funds with a single FI serving as a broker between the two parties. The FI
12. In addition to information costs, FIs help small savers alleviate liquidity risk. Liquidity risk occurs when savers
are not able to sell their securities quickly and at their fair market values. Commercial banks, for example, are able