Chapter–by–chapter aids: Chapter 4
Video Case 4: Potbelly Sandwich
This video summarizes the marketing strategy of Potbelly Sandwich Works, Inc. along the 4Ps and
features interview footage with Bryant Keil, Chairman and CEO of the company. Chicago–based Potbelly
Sandwich Works, Inc. is a chain of sandwich shops that competes in the Quick Serve segment of the
restaurant industry. Billed as a unique and “quirky” sandwich joint, Potbelly has strong appeal to young
urban professionals. This video case allows for a discussion of positioning and segmentation. For more
details, see the Video Instructor’s Manual on the Instructor’s Resource CD or the Instructor Side of the
Online Learning Center (www.mhhe.com/fourps).
Video Case 7: Invacare
The Invacare Corporation produces home medical equipment for the domestic market as well as select
global markets. Some of the manufacturing is in USA facilities, including a factory at the main
headquarters in Elyria, Ohio and the HomeFill oxygen concentrator production plant in Florida. The case
provides an interesting context on which to discuss segmentation within the disabled consumer market.
For more details, see the Video Instructor’s Manual on the Instructor’s Resource CD or the Instructor Side
of the Online Learning Center (www.mhhe.com/fourps).
Video Case 8: Segway
This video tells the Segway story and discusses the marketing strategies pursued by Segway Inc. since
the introduction of the Segway® Personal Transporter (PT) on ABC’s “Good Morning America” in 2001.
The Segway story begins in 1999 when inventor Dean Kamen saw a young man in a wheelchair struggle
to get over a curb and recognized a need for a better product. The video case includes many interesting
segmentation and targeting issues that could be discussed. For more details, see the Video Instructor’s
Manual on the Instructor’s Resource CD or the Instructor Side of the Online Learning Center
(www.mhhe.com/fourps).
CHAPTER 4 – COMMENTS ON USE OF ETHICS QUESTION WITH THIS CHAPTER
You just started your dream job as marketing manager for Appy Day Games (ADG). You are their sixth
and latest employee, and the first dedicated to marketing. ADG’s games are fun, easy–to–learn, and sell
stored in the phones, would be sent back to DataMatic, which would package and sell it to its customers
who are looking for leads. DataMatic’s offer would instantly make ADG profitable. DataMatic says its
software already resides on half the games on the “App Store Top 50” anyway. Rachel likes the idea and
figures that if it’s legal and everyone else does it, why shouldn’t ADG? What do you think of DataMatic’s
proposal? Would you advise Rachel to accept the offer? Why or why not?
A Wall Street Journal article, “How Kid Apps Are Data Magnets” (June 27, 2013), inspired this ethics
exercise. This ethics exercise is designed to force students to grapple with issues around privacy. Many
firms are finding that collecting customer data can be more valuable than collecting payment from
customers. So they give away games or apps that track customer behavior – which they sell to other
firms. Much of the activity – at the time of this writing – is legal. It does raise important ethical questions
that an instructor can examine with this exercise.