Part IV
IV-A-2 Perreault, Cannon, & McCarthy
availability of substitutes are involved with respect to demand, while elasticity of supply is
related to the suppliers’ cost structures and profit objectives.
A- 8. This question relates to the discussion of substitutes in the opening section, “Products and
Markets as Seen by Customers and Potential Customers.” ” The text highlights the fact that
elasticity of demand for a product might depend on the availability of substitutes – products
that offer the buyer a choice. A marketing manager would usually prefer to offer a product that
does not have close substitutes because it would mean that there would be less competition
for the business of customers. Of course, the lack of close substitutes does not guarantee a
profit. A company might develop a product that does not satisfy consumer needs – or which
buying dress shoes made of real leather. Thus, a product that does not satisfy customers‘
needs is unlikely to be successful – regardless of the fact that it is “all alone” in the market.
Even a product that potentially meets needs may be unprofitable in a market where there is no
close substitute. For example, a really new product concept might meet needs that potential
customers have, but if they don’t know about the product, or don’t know where to get it, or if it
is not available when they want it, the whole effort may fail. A lack of close substitutes is not a
A- 9. The market’s dimensions become important here. There may be little competition. Similar
prices might result from using the same cost–plus pricing procedures. It could be argued that
many small food retailers are outstanding examples of monopolists. They have a following of
consumers who, for the most part, do no shopping elsewhere and have little knowledge of
prices and selection in other stores. Further, these consumers might have no interest or desire
to search out alternate sources of supply. Thus, the conditions for pure competition are not
(1) Large number of buyers and sellers offering to buy and sell under exactly the same
conditions.
(2) Perfect knowledge about the demand and supply conditions for identical products.
(3) Ease of market entry and exit.
(4) Completely economic behavior, i.e., decisions motivated only by price considerations,
not psychological factors. (This was not mentioned explicitly in the text, but it is assumed
A- 10. Pure competition examples are not easy to come by. Even the (commodity) grain products sold
in central markets like Minneapolis and Kansas City can be thought of as different “products.” ”
But the conditions of pure competition come closest to being met in such large centralized
public markets.
Any kinds of products could be listed for the monopolistic competition examples.
It should be expected that the marketing mixes for some of these products will be similar, as
their characteristics and their market situations are similar. This question encourages the
students to begin to categorize products, anticipating the material in Chapter 8 and the
subsequent material on Place and Promotion that is related to these product classes. Using
the blackboard to list and organize the students’ suggestions, this question can be used – like
cases – to draw out principles and generalizations.