from the service station, and the gasoline has spread onto and below the surface of your
property. Discuss sources of value loss to your property from the contamination.
Solution: Most importantly, as the owner, you might be responsible for the cleanup on the
property despite not causing the contamination. Second, the potential resale value is
2. A local businessman has applied for a permit to construct a bar that will feature “adult
dancing” in a commercially zoned area across the street from your residential
subdivision. As an owner of a $350,000 house within the subdivision, would you favor or
oppose this development? What effect do you think it could have on the value of your
property? If you were opposed, how could you fight approval of the permit?
Solution: Constructing an adult establishment near a residential area creates a negative
externality to the surrounding neighborhood. The development probably will adversely
affect home values in the residential subdivision. Opponents to the approval of the
3. A medium-size city has proposed to build a “greenway” along a creek that flows through
the center of the city. The city wants to clear a strip about 50 feet wide and construct a
paved path for bicycles and foot traffic (walkers and joggers). Proponents claim that it
would be a highly desirable recreational facility for the community, while a very vocal
and insistent group of opponents claims that it would degrade the environment and open
properties along the creek to undesirable users and influences.
Identify some specific positive and negative aspects of the proposal. Would you be in
favor of the proposal, if you lived in the city? Would it make a difference if you lived
along the creek?
Solution: Positive aspects of the greenway include economic growth of an area and a
recreational facility for the community. Negative aspects include increased pollution,
noise, traffic and possibly crime. In addition, it is unclear what would happen to property
4. The main argument traditionally advanced in favor of zoning is that it protects property
values. Do you believe this contention? If so, how does zoning protect property values? If
you do not believe the contention, why not?