Chapter 06 – Process Costing
6-52 Implementing Process Cost Systems; Activity-based Costing;
Standard Costing (25 min)
Case 1: Because of the moderate volatility in materials prices and because
of the relatively large percentage of costs in ending work-in-process, the
FIFO method should be chosen over the weighted-average method in this
case. The batch sizes fit in a relatively narrow range (100-250 batch size
Case 2: This is the simplest case, with stable prices, low ending inventory
and average batch size. A normal cost, traditional, weighted-average
method is likely to work fine. Because prices do not fluctuate, there is little
need for department-level standards and analysis to identify cost variances,
and since there is little ending inventory, there is little need for FIFO
Case 3: this case involves highly volatile materials prices and materials are
a significant percentage of product cost, so that a standard cost and a FIFO
method would be appropriate. The fact that ending work-in-process is a
relatively significant cost supports this conclusion; using FIFO would mean
Case 4: Prices are stable so that standard costing and FIFO are probably
not needed. Also, ending work-in-process inventory is relatively low, so
that FIFO is probably not needed to more accurately determine the
assignment of costs to ending work-in-process and finished goods.
6-48