Chapter 01 – Cost Management and Strategy
PROBLEMS
1-45 Strategy; Downsizing Luxury (15 min)
BMW, Tiffany, Audi and Mercedes-Benz are-well known luxury brands and
their products are know to be among the most highly-regarded and
expensive in their respective product markets. So it is clear that their
competitive strategy is differentiation.
Does the the move into downmarket products mean the firms are
moving to a cost leadership strategy? Not likely, as the reason for the
popularity of the new, less expensive products is the attachment to the
luxury brand. So the question arises, can this new strategy lead to what
Michael Porter calls ”getting stuck in the middle.” As explained in the text,
Porter’s view is that a company cannot succed at both cost leadership and
differentiation. That is, the customer is attracted to the products becuase
of the low price or the differentiation, and a mixing of the two will lead to
confusion in the market and loss of the differentiation. Will the less
expensive products dilute the luxury brand?
So, the expansion of the these companies to the downmarket creates
a risk for these companies that the brand can be dilulted, and of less value.
However, as Mark Del Rosso (chief operating officer of Audi of America)
notes in a recent BloombergBusinessweek article (“The Downside of Low-
End Luxury Cars”), “Consumers ultimately choose the products that best
suit their lifestyle, and what we are seeing is that the (Audi) A4 has not
faced any lost volume, and that A3 sales have provided incremental gains.”
Whether the more expensive products of the Audi brand will continue to be
unaffected is a question that will be answered in the coming years.
Source: “The Downside of Low-End Luxury Cars,” Mark Clothier,
BloombergBusinessweek, July 21, 2014; “Tiffany Moves Down Market and
Makes a Mint,” Kyle Stock, Bloomberg Businessweek, May 21, 2014.
In a similar manner, the motorcycle maker Buell which is known as one of
the best and most expensive bikes in the world, and having a proud racing
tradition, is now testing the waters of entering the market for low-price
motorcycles. Source: “High-End Motorcycles Meet India’s Mopeds,
Bloomberg Businessweek, August 25, 1914, pp 52-53.
1-31
Chapter 01 – Cost Management and Strategy
1-46 Current Economic Information; Use of the Internet (30 min)
Information obtained from the Federal Reserve Board site, in March 2015:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/fof/FOFTables.aspx
Gross Domestic Product (Table F6)
Gross domestic product gained 12% from the period 2011 to 2014, rising
from $15,517 billion in 2011 to $17,418 billion in 2014. Overall this is a
sign of a economic recovery. This can be compared to the 2007-2009
period of the recession in which there was virtually no gain in GDP. GDP
is an important measure of economic activity, so this is clearly a positive
sign for the recovery.
Home Mortgages (Table F218)
On almost every dimension, home mortgage assets fell from 2011 to 2014,
continuing the pattern of 2007 to 2010. Despite a small increase in 2014,
all sectors were down a total $139 billion during the 2011-2014 period, a
five percent decline over the period. Media reports during this time have
explained that the housing bust was a key factor in the slow economic
recovery, and this data is consistent with that.
Overall, these figures reflect an economy slowly recovering from recession
at the time the data was obtained.
1-32
Education.
1.47 Strategy; Innovation (15 min)
The rate of innovation is higher in software and services, semiconductors,
pharmaceuticals, biotech, and technology hardware because the firms in
these industries compete largely on innovation. For example, a drug firm
is successful to the extent it is able to develop new drugs; cost efficiency
is not a key to its success, and it is unlikely to be a cost leader. The only
exception to this might be a manufacturer of generic drugs, where quality
as well as cost leadership would be important.
1-33
Education.
Chapter 01 – Cost Management and Strategy
1-48 Enterprise Risk Management (20 min)
The risk factors in the UHG (United Health Group) ERM appear to be
relatively comprehensive. A manufacturer will have different risk factors
than a service firm such as UHG, so the ERM of the auto parts
manufacturer would recognize these differences. For example, while the
auto manufacturer will likely have a risk category for the external
environment, under this category it would have a risk factor of, for
example, trend in input prices or in auto demand instead of trend in medical
loss/utilization.
Also, an auto parts manufacturer will likely place much more
emphasis on risk factors in the category, business process execution. As a
manufacturer, most of the cost and risk lies in this category –
manufacturing costs, warranty liability, raw materials costs and availability,
etc, will be important risk factors in this category.
Another difference is in the analysis and reporting category. It is
much more likely that a manufacturer will also have a sustainability report
as part of its reporting process. Investors and regulators are likely to
expect this. UHG’s operations do not have the environmental impact of an
auto manufacturer.
The risk category, business strategies and policies, is likely to look
somewhat similar for a manufacturer. While the strategies and policies will
be different, the types of risks listed by UHG are likely to be similar to those
faced by a manufacturer.
The risk category, people, will likely differ somewhat for a
manufacturer. Rather than a focus on fraud and abuse and leadership, the
manufacturer will likely be more focused on productivity and people who
are able to adapt and perform in a very cost leadership type of competition
that is common to this type of manufacturing.
1-34
Education.
Chapter 01 – Cost Management and Strategy
1-48 (continued -1)
The category, technology and data, is also likely to be different for a
manufacturer. While data management is critical for a health insurance
and health services company like UHG that has many customers, the data
management issues will likely be less challenging for the manufacturer.
The manufacturer needs effective systems to track production costs,
operating performance, sustainability measures, and financial performance;
this is likely to be a simpler technology than for UHG.
For a broad example of the risks that CFOs from many industries are
concerned about, a 2012 survey by CFO magazine finds that CFOs find
the following to be the most important risks in their firms (and percentage of
CFOs indicating the risk is important to their firm):
Customer demand/profitability (66%)
Workforce capabilities/talent management (41%)
Recent or pending regulatory requirement (35%)
Commodity costs (27%)
Technology/data security(22%)
Risks in markets overseas (14%)
Availability of credit/bank relationships (13%)
Inflation (9%)
Natural disasters (7%)
Tax policies (5%)
Source: Patrick H. Stroh, “Enterprise Risk Management at United Health
Group (UHG),” Strategic Finance, July 2005, pp 27-35; Kate O. Sullivan,
“Keeping Cool in the Hot Seat,” CFO Magazine, March 2012, pp 39-424
1-35
Education.
Chapter 01 – Cost Management and Strategy
1-49 Strategy; Service Company (20 min)
1. Full Frame employs the cost leadership strategy by focusing primarily
on low price and profitability through growth. This is consistent with
Clyde’s description of the business as one that is difficult to
differentiate.
2. Clyde’s pricing and employee-incentive policies are consistent with
the cost leadership strategy. The fact that the business has grown
from one to five stores in the past seven years is an indication that
the strategy is working.
Potential problems:
a. While the growth strategy should work for a time, there is likely to
be a limit to the total demand, within Clyde’s community for the
framing type of service that Full Frame provides. Clyde may have
to franchise the business or expand it beyond his current family –
adding stores in other communities or perhaps other cities and
states. This will require a professional level of management that
Clyde will have to adopt if he wants the business to continue to
grow.
b. Managing a company with the help of family members has its own
set of rewards and potential problems. It may be more difficult to
resolve disputes and to effectively employ performance
management.
c. Clyde’s current incentive plan rewards all employees for stores
where efficiency has improved. The incentive might be more fair
and effective if it could be targeted to each employee; however,
there might be difficulty in measuring performance at the individual
employee level.
1-36
Education.
Chapter 01 – Cost Management and Strategy
1-50 Strategy: Brand Value (15 min)
This question is intended for class discussion. Some students will be
surprised by some of the firms on the two lists, and also by firms that are
missing from the lists. The major point of the exercise is to discuss the
nature of the differentiation strategy and how firms that have developed
valuable brands have succeeded in making this differentiation. Ask the
class if they themselves, or they expect others, would pay more for
products of the firms on the top brands list. Those that say yes will be
acknowledging the “earnings premium” that Interbrand Corp. refers to in its
analysis.
As an aside, the list of top 10 brands for 2014 has 7 of the 10 companies
in both the 2014 and the 2010 list, with Toyota and Samsung entering the
list in 2012 and Mercedes-Benz entering the list in 2014. The lists each
year from 2010-2014 are otherwise quite similar. Many of these firms have
been on the list for several years.
Note however, that as the recession has potentially changed consumer
buying behaviors, some suggest that the strength of brands is weakening,
and that cost-conscious consumers will look for savings and avoid the
higher priced branded products. See Ellen Byron, “At the Supermarket
Checkout, Frugality Trumps Brand Loyalty,” The Wall Street Journal,
November 6, 2008, p D1. On this point, also consider the discussion of
BMW, Mercedes, Audi, and Tiffany in problem 1-45.
Is there also an “earnings premium” for the firms on the Boston Consulting
Group’s most-innovative list? Note that Apple, Toyota, IBM, Google,
Microsoft, and Samsung are on both lists. Note also that none of the
ten on this list are clear cost leaders. These firms succeed by providing
new and attractive products, such as Apple’s iPad. So they are arguably all
differentiators as well.
To further the analysis, Bloomberg ranks countries on innovation, and the
2014 rankings, in order, are: 1. South Korea, 2. Japan, 3. Germany, 4.
Finland, 5. Israel, 6. United States, 7. Sweden, 8. Singapore, 9. France,
and 10. United Kingdom.
“What’s in the Innovation Sandwich,” Bloomberg Businessweek, January
19, 2015, pp 49-51.
1-37
Education.
Chapter 01 – Cost Management and Strategy
1-50 (continued -1)
The top ten firms to receive technology patents from the U.S. Patent Office
in 2013 (www.uspto.gov):
Company 2013
IBM 6,788
Samsung Electronics 4,652
Canon 3,820
Sony 3,073
Microsoft 2,659
Panasonic 2,582
Toshiba 2,365
Qualcomm 2,103
LG Electronics 1,945
Google 1,851
Notice that there are some differences between the list of innovative
companies as measured by the number of patents and the list as measured
by the survey of senior executives. In both cases, for both lists, an
examination of the company’s products suggests that the firms on both lists
are primarily differentiators. However, the survey by executives is
probably a more reliable measure of innovation in a strategic sense
because it reflects not just the number of patents, but also the company’s
effectiveness at marketing and promoting its new products.
Some of the firms on the list are differentiated on innovation and style, such
as Apple, which enjoys a 30% gross margin, far higher than other firms in
its industry. See Arik Hesseldahl, “Why the Mac is Still a Rock Star for
Apple,” Bloomberg Business Week, June 28-July 4, 2010, p 28.
1-38
Chapter 01 – Cost Management and Strategy
1-51 Strategy; Customer Service (15 min)
Note: A 2014 JD Power survey lists 50 “Customer Champions” which
include many firms on the 2010 list (www.jdpower.com); because of the
length of the list, it is not included in the problem for the students, but is
included for your review below.
Most of the companies are well-known and the students will likely
recognize them as differentiators based on customer service and a number
of other factors including product quality and brand. The articles cited
below explain for each firm how it goes about achieving worldclass
customer service. For some, like LL Bean, it is the attention toward
satisfying employees so they are happier to provide better customer
service. For USAA, it is employing military veterans and extensive training.
For Ace Hardware, it is the use of technology.
Source: Jena McGregor, “Customer Service Champs,” Bloomberg
Business Week, March 1, 2010, p 44; Jena McGregor, “Customer Service
Champs,” Business Week, March 5, 2009, pp 32-34.
J.D. Power Customer Champions, 2014
Amazon.com
Amica Mutual
Apple
AvMed Health Plans
Bangor Savings Bank
Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank
Boost Mobile
Cadillac
Capital District Physicians
Clark Public Utilities
Clay Electric Cooperative
Drury Hotels
Enterprise First Citizens Bancorp
Four Seasons
1-39
Education.
Chapter 01 – Cost Management and Strategy
1-51 (continued – 1)
Frost Bank
Good Neighbor Pharmacy
HealthPartners
Homewood Suites
Independent Health Association
Jackson EMC
Jaguar
JetBlue Airways
Lexus
Lincoln
MetroPCS
National
Neiman Marcus
NJM Insurance Co.
Publix (Retail and Pharmacy)
Quicken Loans
The Ritz-Carlton
Saks Fifth Avenue
Sawnee EMC
Scottrade
SECO Energy
SelectHealth
Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative
Southwest Airlines
SRP
Staybridge Suites
Straight Talk
Tennessee Farm Bureau
Texas Farm Bureau
TracFone
U.S. Cellular
Union First Market Bank
United Community Bank
(See more at: http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/jd-power-
recognizes-50-brands-2014-customer-champions#sthash.h0Ca15z7.dpuf).
1-40
Education.