V. ANSWERS TO PROBLEMS AND PROBLEM
CASES:
1. No. The court found that the environmental impacts would be relatively
minor-and
that
the
2. Yes. Vanguard is legally liable to meet the limitations established in the SIP and to do
it
3. Yes. The court held that the owner of the hotel should be required to abate the
asbestos
4. Yes. The court held that in the definition of “point source” humans were not mentioned
and
the words used evoke physical structures that systematically convey pollutants from
an
5. No. While the Corps may consider economic effects that are proximately located to
changes
6. Yes. The statute penalizes “any person” who knowingly treats, stores or disposes of
any
7. Yes. The Court held that under the Superfund law General Electric was entitled to
recoup