Chapter 44 – Shareholders’ Rights and Liabilities
V. ANSWERS TO PROBLEM CASES
1. No. The court held that the Oregon statute, drawn from the MBCA, did not permit the
bylaws to determine a quorum for shareholder meetings. Only in the articles of incorporation
2. Here is one of many possibilities. There should be seven classes of shares. Five classes are
identical to each other. Each has the right to elect one director to the board of directors,
which director has the power to vote on any matter submitted to the board. Each of the five
managers receives all the shares of one of the five classes. Each class owns 5% of the equity
of the company. No amendment to the articles of incorporation may be made without the
3. No. The proxy James gave to Louise was revocable, because the proxy, that is, the part of the
4. Aspen wanted to exercise a dissenter’s right, or right of appraisal, that is, to have a court
determine the value of the shares into which the warrants were convertible upon exercise, and
therefore, the amount that would be paid to Aspen had it been a shareholder. The Delaware
5. No. The Delaware Supreme Court ruled it was inappropriate to deny a shareholder the right
to seek information merely because he once filed a derivative suit, because such a bright-line
rule did not comport with existing Delaware law or sound policy. The court held that King
6. Yes. The business judgment rule protects a board’s decision whether to pay a dividend,
requiring that the board’s decision to retain earnings and not pay a dividend be in good faith
44-1
© 2016 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.