Chapter 26 – Estates and Trusts
D. Intestacy
1. Note that if a person fails to make a valid will, the law will make one for him through
state intestacy statutes. Naturally, the scheme of property distribution specified in such
statutes may not be what the individual would have desired. They are designed to
effectuate the presumed intent of the deceased person, and the assumption is that he
would have wanted his property to go to his surviving spouse and/or closest blood
relatives. They do not take into account the quality of the relationship that the decedent
actually had with his heirs. E.g., you may despise one brother and adore another, but
intestacy statutes would give them the equal right to inherit from you.
2. One good technique for illustrating the operation of intestacy statutes is to make a flow
chart of the distributional scheme of your state’s intestacy statute, and have your students
trace how their property would be distributed.
3. Note that real property will pass according to the intestacy statute of the state in which it
is located, while personal property will pass according to the state in which the deceased
was domiciled. Explain the concept of domicile and note that domicile is also important
for determining the venue of administration proceedings.
4. Point out some of the rules regarding inheritance by adopted children, illegitimate
children, siblings related by one parent, and afterborn heirs.
Hill v. Nakai (In re Estate of Hannifin) (p.731): Hannifin treated Nakai as his adopted
son, though there was never a legal adoption. Hannifin died intestate, and Nakai
petitioned to be the Personal Representative of Hannifin’s estate. Hill contested Nakai’s
claim on behalf of himself and 19 other collateral relatives of Hannifin. The trial court
held that the doctrine of equitable adoption—a doctrine of equity that allows a minor to
be treated as a child for legal purposes, as long as there was an agreement to adopt and
the adoption works to the benefit of the child (as opposed to the parent)—entitled Nakai
to inherit from Hannifin as though her were legally adopted. The appeals court, however,
disagreed, finding that the Probate Code preempted the equitable adoption doctrine.
Points for Discussion: What about the doctrine of equitable adoption conflicted with the
Probate Code? What could Hannifin have done prior to his death to avoid this situation?
While the court focuses on simplicity, clarity, and efficiency that results from abandoning
equitable adoption and complying strictly with the language of the Probate code, ask the
students whether they find the outcome here to be just. Was it ethical for Hill and the
other collateral relatives to intervene?
Additional Examples: Problem Case #7; Estate of Kirkpatrick v. Rogers, 77 P.3d 404
(Wyo. S. Ct. 2003).
5. Note the purpose and effect of simultaneous death statutes.
Example: Problem Case #8.
E. Administration of Estates
F. Discuss the need for an organized procedure to collect the assets of an individual who has
died, to satisfy his debts, to pay any taxes and administrative expenses, and to distribute the
remaining assets.
1. Discuss the nature of the probate estate.
2. Note that the administration of an estate is usually carried out under the supervision of a
specialized court, the probate court.
3. Describe the personal representative and his or her responsibilities.
4. Describe the steps in the probate process.
26-4
© 2016 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.