Chapter 03 – Audit Planning, Types of Audit Tests, and Materiality
3-10
Scenario 3:
a. Swell Computers is a profit-oriented entity and income before taxes would normally
be the most appropriate benchmark for determining overall materiality. However,
Swell’s profit ($500,000 income on $7 billion of revenue) is close to breakeven. In
this case, Swell’s auditor can use total assets (.25 – 2%) or total revenues (.5 – 5%) for
b. The detected misstatement is less than both tolerable misstatement and overall
materiality. However, in this instance the adjustment of $1.5 million turns a profit
into a loss. This is one of the qualitative factors that SAB No. 99 requires the auditor
to consider (see Chapter 17), so an adjustment to the financial statements would be
3-32 a. Because of the significant drop in income in 2015, the auditor should use some type
of “normalized” earnings. One approach would be to use the average of 2012 – 2014
(584,000,000 + 520,000,000 + 453,000,000 = 1,557,000,000 / 3 = $519,000,000).
While the firm allows the use of 3 – 10% for the range of percentages, the loss in the
tolerable misstatement would then be $8 million to $13 million.
An alternative way for making these calculations would be to add back the write-
down to the 2015 income ($105 + 465 = $570) and then use a three-year average of
2013 – 2014.
b. The auditor could use the amounts for 2015 total assets and total revenues for the
calculations. Thus, overall materiality using total assets would be: ($23,422,000,000
x .0025 = $59 million) and ($23,422,000,000 x .02 = $468 million). Using 50% as the
multiplier, tolerable misstatement would be $26 million and $203 million,