546
– 546 –
TEACHING NOTE
CASE 20
Wal-Mart in Africa
Overview
In the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008, Wal-Mart began putting more emphasis on international market
expansion due to somewhat limited growth opportunities in its domestic (US) market. In its international
operations, Wal-Mart experienced strong sales growth and opened a record number of new stores; its
international segment grew by 15.2 percent year-on-year in fiscal 2012. By 2012, Wal-Mart operated 10,130
retail stores in 27 countries and posted revenues of US $443.85 billion.
Yet in its search for new growth markets, the company had met with mixed results in certain foreign countries:
successes in wealthier markets like Mexico, Canada, and the UK; challenges in Japan; failures in Germany and
South Korea. Having struggled to establish itself in Japan since entering that market in 2002, Wal-Mart finally
recovered after localizing its business model to better suit the needs of the Japanese retail market. Analysts
opined that Wal-Mart had failed to do the same to suit the needs of the German and South Korean markets, and
Wal-Mart exited both countries in 2006.
By 2010, most of the developed western retail markets reached saturation and Asian markets became highly
competitive. Africa remained the last major emerging market left for Wal-Mart to conquer, despite Africa’s
unstable political environment. To gain an instant footprint in Africa, in September 2010, Wal-Mart announced
an offer to purchase a 51 percent stake in the second biggest retailer in Africa, South African-based Massmart.
Massmart, founded in 1990, had rapidly increased its presence into the food-retailing business, operated 40
grocery stores and a total of 211 stores in sub-Saharan African nations, ranging from Botswana to Zambia. Since
the market potential of many individual African countries was limited, Wal-Mart needed Massmart to expand its
operations to many countries across Africa in order to achieve economies of scale.
Yet Wal-Mart faced opposition from powerful trade unions and some government departments in South Africa,
stakeholders who contended that Wal-Mart’s entry would drive down wages and lead to unemployment. Wal-
Mart countered by pledging the creation of 15,000 new jobs and a 100 million rand (US$13.37 million) local
industry competitiveness fund. The proposed merger went to the courts to decide. Analysts remained divided in
their opinion about Wal-Mart’s prospects in Africa, due to rampant poverty, low levels of income, low literacy
rates, political instability, and inadequate infrastructure. Just before the Competition Appeal Court of South
Africa’s ruled in favor of Wal-Mart’s deal to purchase Massmart, Massmart announced that it was going to
expand and open 20 more stores in Nigeria. Was Wal-Mart poised to succeed in Africa, or to repeat its earlier
missteps—in Germany and Japan and South Korea—by failing to understand the needs of the diverse local
African markets?
* This teaching note reflects the thinking and analysis of Professor Armand Gilinsky, Sonoma State University. We are most
grateful for his insight, analysis and contributions to how the case can be taught successfully.
*