4
Chapter 5: Identity and Intercultural Communication
© 2018 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
o As individuals are growing up, they identify with many groups, based on gender,
race, ethnicity, class, sexual orientation, religion, and nationality (Tajfel, 1981,
1982).
o Because people belong to various groups, they develop multiple identities that
come into play at different times, depending on the context.
• Communication scholar Ting-Toomey (1993, 2005) argues in her identity negotiation
theory that cultural variability influences one’s sense of self and ultimately influences
how successful people are in intercultural interactions.
o Her argument goes like this: Individuals define themselves in relation to groups
they belong to due to the basic human need for security and inclusion. At the same
time, humans also need differentiation from these same groups.
B. The Interpretive Perspective
• The interpretive perspective builds on the notions of identity formation discussed
previously but takes a more dynamic turn.
o That is, it emphasizes that identities are negotiated, co-created, reinforced, and
challenged though communication with others; they emerge when messages are
exchanged between persons (Hecht, Warren, Jung, & Krieger, 2005; Ting-
with and the topics of conversation.
o And one’s communication is probably most successful when the person one is
talking with confirms the identity one thinks is most important at the moment.
• Central to the interpretive perspective is the idea that people’s identities are expressed
communicatively—in core symbols, labels, and norms.
o Core symbols (or cultural values) tell people about the fundamental beliefs and
the central concepts that define a particular identity.
C. The Critical Perspective
• Like the interpretive perspective, the critical perspective emphasizes the dynamic nature
of identities, but in addition, it emphasizes the contextual and often conflictual elements
of identity development.
o This perspective pays particular attention to the societal structures and institutions
that constrain identities and are often the root of injustice and oppression (Collier,
2005).