Problem 6.105
Three common designs for a bridge to span a multilane highway are shown.
Design 1 is the same as that considered in Example 6.8 on p. 414, where link
CD
is used to connect the two spans of the bridge. Design 2 uses two simply
supported I beams. Design 3 uses a single I beam from points
A
to
E
with
a roller support at midspan. Comment on the pros and cons of each of these
designs, considering issues such as the following:
Which are straightforward to analyze for determining the support reac-
tions and which may be difficult to analyze?
Which may be easier to construct?
Which may be more sensitive to unexpected support motion, such as if
the support at Bsettles with time?
Which may be safer, such as if the support at
B
were accidentally struck
by a vehicle passing under the bridge?
Note: Concept problems are about explanations, not computations.