Chapter Seventeen Quiz: Methods of Persuasion
Name _____________________________ Section _________________
Indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false by circling the appropriate letter.
1. T F The fallacy of appeal to tradition assumes that something old is automatically better
than something new.
2. T F Because it moves from a general principle to a specific conclusion, reasoning from
principle is the opposite of reasoning from specific instances.
3. T F A speaker’s credibility is affected by everything she or he says and does during the
speech.
4. T F Speakers who explain their expertise on the speech topic are likely to reduce their
credibility with the audience.
5. T F According to your textbook, it is redundant for persuasive speakers to give their
evidence and then to state the point the evidence is meant to prove.
6. T F False cause—or post hoc, ergo propter hoc—is an error in reasoning in which a
speaker mistakenly assumes that because two things are similar in one respect, they
are similar in all respects.
7. T F Arguments guilty of the ad hominem fallacy attack the person rather than dealing with
the real issue in dispute.
8. T F Studies have shown that speakers with low initial credibility need to use more
evidence than speakers with high initial credibility.
9. T F According to your textbook, the strongest source of emotional appeal in a persuasive
speech is the sincerity and conviction of the speaker.
10. T F The following is an example of reasoning from analogy: “The United Nations charter
establishes the right of all people to live free of political repression. The government
of North Korea subjects its people to political repression. Therefore, the government
of North Korea is violating the UN charter.”