something she feared; some teachers were going to argue against the new standards.
A second voice came from the crowd, “I’ve talked with parents and they’re concerned
too. One of my student’s parents complained that her daughter had special learning
needs and that she would most likely have difficulties in passing the standards.”
Dr. Lapovich politely reminded the faculty, “We have to think of the students first. We
have to be able to say that we are doing everything we can to help students learn. If the
first teaching method we try doesn’t work, then we try another, then another; whatever it
takes. Isn’t that why we are hereto help students learn?”
One of the district’s elementary teachers replied, “Don’t you think we’re removing some
of the incentive for doing well by threatening them with possible failure? Might this not
increase cheating if standards are too rigorous? And how will my students feel when
some try hard but aren’t successful? How will we explain to them that effort doesn’t
matter?” Dr. Lapovich sighed as she realized that this would be a very long year of
change.
Consider some of the arguments made for and against standards-based education.
Would cognitive development theorists (e.g., Piaget and Vygotsky), psychosocial
developmental theorists (e.g., Erikson), and moral developmental theorists (e.g.,
Kohlberg) argue for or against this teaching-learning approach?
Every school district offers students with special needs an array of services. Make a list
of these services beginning with the least restrictive, and ending with the most
restrictive. Illustrate each service with a concrete example, specifying a child’s grade
level, disability, placement, and specifics of where and with whom the child spends the
day.