knowing which tools are best for a given task, digital investigators must be capable of validating
the results to ensure that their results are correct. Validation involves checking and documenting
the results of one tool with another either by comparing the results from both tools to ensure they
are in agreement, or by using one tool to verify low-level data has been interpreted correctly by
another tool. For instance, two tools should recover the same deleted files from a given file
system, and all tools should calculate date-time stamps correctly.
In addition to validating their own work and tools, forensic examiners can benefit from the
results of the US National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST) Computer Forensic Tool
Testing (CFTT) program. This program is currently testing hardware write blockers as well as
the ability of forensic tools to acquire digital evidence from storage media and recover deleted
files. This testing does not include the recovery of overwritten data using more sophisticated
Can Intelligence Agencies Read Overwritten Data? A Response to Gutmann,
The role a computer plays in a crime will dictate how it and its contents are processed.
Therefore, it is important for digital investigators to understand the different roles, which are
d Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic
Contraband Fruits of Crime Instrumentality Evidence
Hardware Cloned mobile
telephones, or
hardware for
Stolen computers, or
equipment
purchased with
Printer used to
produce counterfeit
banknotes, or
Mobile phone may
be evidence of
parole violation even