Compare two situations. (A) A firm is not legally responsible for damages that result
from air pollution caused by its production of steel. (B) A firm is legally responsible for
damages that result from its production of steel. Ronald Coase argued that
A) bargaining between the firm and the victims of the air pollution caused by the firm
will result in little reduction of pollution in either situation (A) or (B) because the firm
has greater economic and political power than the victims.
B) bargaining between the firm and the victims of the air pollution caused by the firm
would lead to a greater reduction in pollution in situation (A) than situation (B).
C) bargaining between the firm and the victims of the air pollution caused by the firm
would lead to a smaller reduction in pollution in situation (A) than situation (B).
D) bargaining between the firm and the victims of the air pollution caused by the firm
would lead to an equal reduction in pollution in situation (A) and situation (B).
If you pay $2,000 in taxes on an income of $20,000, and a tax of $3,500 on an income
of $30,000, then over this range of income the tax is
A) regressive.
B) proportional.
C) progressive.
D) There is insufficient information to answer the question.