e. none of the above
The Coase Theorem works best in places that transaction costs for contracts among
people is low. Often in the world of torts and externalities both parties can claim that
they have rights to impose on others. One case is that of a railroad that is noisy and
scares the cattle and the rancher whose cattle sometimes wander in front of moving
trains causing damage to them and the train. What does the Coase say would happen?
a. The train should have property right to be safe from wandering cattle, and the rancher
should be liable for train damage of rampaging cattle.
b. The rancher should have the property right to be safe from noisy trains, and the
railroad should be liable for weight loss of cattle from train whistles and rumbling
noise.
c. If transaction costs are low, the efficient activity will occur, either the rancher or
railroad installing fences to protect from rampaging cattle and/or sound insulation with
trees, or if it is cheaper, fewer train trips per day. The cheapest or most efficient solution
will happen, regardless of who is assigned the original property right.
The chain store paradox of an incumbent who accommodates a finite stream of
potential entrants threatening to enter sequentially numerous markets illustrates
a. backwards induction
b. the unraveling problem
c. subgame perfect equilibrium
d. best reply responses
e. all of the above