The location has far-reaching ramifications (such as high-tech companies) that need
________.
A) a highly-skilled work force
B) a high traffic site
C) easy access to shipping routes
D) a nearby retail district
Mini-Case 2-1: Doing “good” but not doing the “right” thing
Ed and Marci Buchanan are spouses and partners in a business called “Flags
Unlimited.” They made and sold a variety of national flags in various shapes. About 40
percent of their total revenues came from a single chain retailer, MegaMart USA that
owned 798 stores throughout the United States. When Ed and Daisy started their
company, their son’s classmate’s father was a senior buyer at MegaMart USA. The
buyer, Arturo Higuain, encouraged Ed and Daisy to submit a bid to MegaMart USA and
he helped the couple establish the relationship that led to subsequent recurring sales at
the retailer. Higuain’s wife, Lupe was the head of the school’s PTA and in charge for
fund raising. Without Arturo’s asking, the Buchanans started contributing significant
sums of money to the PTA. Arturo never discouraged them from contributing. In a cost
cutting move, Arturo was laid off from MegaMart USA and in his place, Cindy
Carmichael became the buyer who interacted with the Buchanans. Cindy hinted to the
Buchanans that there were other vendors willing to supply flags at a lower price than
the Buchanans but that if they would contribute to the rebuilding of her (Cindy’s)
community’s softball park, they would continue to sell their product at MegaMart USA.
Contributing to a PTA and donating to build a community park are civic actions. Could
they not be considered good actions because they indicate social responsibility?