Clarissa is a sales representative for a large pharmaceutical firm. While calling on one
of her major clients, the purchasing director of a hospital, the client told her confidential
information that a sales representative from a competing firm had passed on to him. The
information completely contradicts Clarissa’s firm’s understanding of the competitor’s
business strategy, and would allow Clarissa’s employer to gain many of the competitor’s
clients. What ethical implications may result from this situation?
a. There is no ethical or legal concern here for Clarissa.
b. The ethical dilemma is not Clarissa’s but her client’s, since he passed on confidential
information to her voluntarily.
c. The ethical dilemma here is the right of competitors not to reveal certain information.
d. This is an example of ethical competitor intelligence obtained as eavesdropping.
CaseScenario3:Abrahamson’Jewelers.
Through its sole location in an affluent suburb of San Francisco, Abrahamson’s Jewelers
has established a strong niche market in the upscale jewelry store segment.
Abrahamson’s was founded in 1871 and is currently owned and operated by John
Wickersham, who bought the firm from its namesake founders in 1985. Wickersham
joined the firm as a trainee out of high school, completed his gemology training, and
several years later took ownership with the financial help of his parents. That debt has
long been paid off and business has thrived. When he first acquired the business,
Abrahamson’s offered a full range of jewelry and gift items from watches to wedding
sets to silverware to clocks. This broad range of products was mirrored by a broad price
range-$10,000 Rolex watches were sold next to $50 Seiko watches. While some jewelry
was custom designed and manufactured, most of the products were “case ready,”
meaning they were sourced from large jewelry and silver manufacturers from around
the world. Over the last 15 years, Wickersham has narrowed the company’s product