A joint owner “takes” the property of the other joint owner if the taker had no right to
use or keep the property and
a. doing so infringes on the rights of the joint owner
b. doing so causes harm to the joint owner
c. doing so offends the joint owner
d. does so in a suspicious manner
Which of the following is NOT one of the guidelines for American courts to define
obscenity established in the 1973 case of Millerv.California?
a. Whether “the average person applying contemporary community standards” would
find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.
b. Whether the work or communication depicts or describes, in a patently offensive
way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law.
c. Whether the work or communication, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic,
political, or scientific value.
d. all of these are guidelines established to define obscenity in the 1973 case of
Millerv.California