Temblador Corporation purchased a machine 7 years ago for $319,000 when it
launched product E26T. Unfortunately, this machine has broken down and cannot be
repaired. The machine could be replaced by a new model 330 machine costing
$323,000 or by a new model 230 machine costing $285,000. Management has decided
to buy the model 230 machine. It has less capacity than the model 330 machine, but its
capacity is sufficient to continue making product E26T. Management also considered,
but rejected, the alternative of dropping product E26T and not replacing the old
machine. If that were done, the $285,000 invested in the new machine could instead
have been invested in a project that would have returned a total of $386,000.
In making the decision to buy the model 230 machine rather than the model 330
machine, the sunk cost was:
A. $319,000
B. $386,000
C. $285,000
D. $323,000
Answer:
Boggs Company has 40,000 shares of common stock outstanding. The book value per
share of this stock was $60.00 and the market value per share was $75.00 at the end of
the year. Net income for the year was $400,000. Interest on long term debt was
$40,000. Dividends paid to common stockholders were $3.00 per share. The tax rate
was 30%. The company’s price-earnings ratio at the end of the year was:
A. 25
B. 20
C. 7.50
D. 6.00