On March 15, 2015, Kent, CPA, issued an unqualified opinion on a client’s audited
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014. On May 4, 2015, Kent’s
internal inspection program disclosed that engagement personnel failed to observe the
client’s physical inventory. Omission of this procedure impairs Kent’s present ability to
support the unqualified opinion. If the stockholders are currently relying on the opinion,
Kent should first
A. advise management to disclose to the stockholders that Kent’s unqualified opinion
should not be relied on.
B. undertake to apply alternative procedures that would provide a satisfactory basis for
the opinion.
C. reissue the auditors’ reports and add an explanatory paragraph describing the
departure from generally accepted auditing standards.
D. compensate for the omitted procedure by performing tests of controls to reduce audit
risk to a sufficiently low level.
In confirming a client’s accounts receivable in prior years, an auditor discovered many
differences between recorded account balances and confirmation replies. These
differences were resolved and were not misstatements. In defining the sampling unit for
the current year’s audit, the auditor most likely would choose
A. customers with credit balances.
B. small account balances.
C. individual overdue balances.
D. individual invoices.