In Illinois v. Caballes, the Supreme Court ruled that:
a. Drivers of automobiles have a reasonable expectation of privacy that protects them
from the use of drug- sniffing dogs without a warrant.
b. Drug-sniffing dogs can only be used if there is reasonable suspicion the driver has
narcotics.
c. Drug-sniffing dog searches are prone to many errors and are so intimidating that
officials must have probable cause to use them.
d. The use of well-trained drug-sniffing dogs to expose contraband items that would
remain hidden in a routine traffic stop, does not intrude on a driver’s reasonable
expectation of privacy and the Fourth Amendment does not apply.
Which of the following is TRUE with regard to bail?
a. The Judiciary Act of 1789 provides that a person charged with a non-capital offense
shall be permitted to bail.
b. The Eighth Amendment states that citizens have a Constitutional right to bail.
c. The Judiciary Act of 1789 and the Eighth Amendment provides that a person charged
with any offense shall be permitted bail.
d. The Judiciary Act of 1789 did NOT provide that a person charged with a non-capital
offense shall be permitted bail.