The Supreme Court has ruled that hearsay evidence poses no confrontation clause
problem so long as two conditions are met. What are these conditions?
a. the out-of-court declarant is “unavailable” to testify at trial and there are multiple
witnesses prepared to testify that the statement was made
b. the out-of-court declarant is “unavailable” to testify at trial and the statement can be
empirically tested for reliability
c. the out-of-court declarant is deceased and the statement has ‘some indicia of
reliability”
d. the out-of-court declarant is “unavailable” to testify at trial and the statement has
‘some indicia of reliability.”
After obtaining a waiver of a suspect’s rights police start the process of interrogating a
criminal suspect about a particular crime. After a few questions are asked, the suspect
clearly and unambiguously communicates her desire to talk to an attorney. Which of the
following legal limitations are placed on the police?
They cannot, from this point forward, take any steps to deliberately elicit
a. They cannot, from this point forward, take any steps to deliberately elicit
incriminating statements, under any circumstances.
b. They cannot, from this point forward, take any steps to deliberately
elicitincriminating statements unless the criminal suspect initiates the contact.