This amendment assures Americans will continue to be free to pursue those interests
that government does not demonstrate a compelling reason to restrict.
The Sixth Amendment requires an impartial and __________jury.
You are a police detective and, though you lack probable cause, you are convinced that
Amy Able is the mastermind behind a series of art thefts in the north end of town. You
believe that she plans the thefts, hires local thieves, then sells the artwork overseas. You
know that her usual thief has been arrested on an unrelated charge, so you decide to
arrange a meeting between a confidential informant (CI) with a history of petty theft
and Amy Able. At the meeting, your CI is wearing a “wire” to tape the conversations.
During the meeting, Amy is reluctant to go ahead with more thefts, because she tells
your CI that she is “out of the business” and wants to retire. At this point, your listening
device malfunctions, but your CI later tells you he convinced her by threatening to go to
the police and ruining her reputation as an art dealer. Amy reluctantly agrees to plan the
heist and, several days later, meets with your CI to go over the details. At this point, you
know that she has committed sufficient acts to be guilty of conspiracy to commit theft
under local law and arrest her. You give the DA the transcript of the conversations
recorded by the wire and she says it is a “slam dunk.” What legal issues, if any, are
raised by the facts? What should you do, if anything, as the detective on this case?