CASE 16.1
Appeals courts approach appellate decision making in different ways, depending on the
types of questions presented for review on appeal. Sometimes appellate courts are very
deferential to what happened in lower courts, while other times they give no deference
at all. How much deference or scrutiny an appellate court will afford to the decisions of
a judge, jury, or administrative agency in an appeal is referred to as the standard of
review.
The least deferential standard of appellate review in criminal cases is
a. de novo c. clear error
b. reasonableness d. abuse of discretion
CASE 4.2
At the second level of state courts are the trial courts of general jurisdiction, usually
referred to as major trial courts. An estimated 2,000 major trial courts in the 50 states
and the District of Columbia are staffed by more than 11,000 judges (LaFountain et al.
2008). The term general jurisdiction means that these courts have the legal authority to
decide all matters not specifically delegated to lower courts.
Over the past decade and a half, criminal cases filed in general jurisdiction courts
(primarily felonies) increased
a. 25%
b. 45%
c. 35%
d. 55%