CASE 12.1
Some people within the court system are concerned that plea bargaining reduces the
courthouse to a place where guilt or innocence is negotiated like prices in a flea market.
Primarily, though, opposition to plea bargaining reflects different ideological
preferences. What is particularly interesting is that civil libertarians as well as
spokespersons for law and order see plea bargaining as a danger, but often for different
reasons.
What do due process adherents advocate regarding plea bargaining?
a. abolishing bargaining and increasing the number of trials.
b. abolishing bargaining.
c. increasing the number of trials.
d. none of these answers is correct.
CASE 2.2
Joe Smith suffers from paranoid schizophrenia. He has been under a doctor’s care for
ten years, but often stops taking his medication because he thinks he’s cured. While off
his medication, Joe steals a car to “escape from a CIA hit man,” accidentally running
over and seriously injuring a pedestrian in the process. Joe is arrested and charged with
several felonies. His public defender believes he is not guilty by reason of insanity.
Which of the following is true regarding the use of the insanity defense in this case?
a. In addition to the burden of proving the elements of the offense, the prosecution bears
the additional burden of proving the defendant is not insane.
b. With increasing public awareness regarding mental illnesses, the insanity defense has
become more commonly presented and is often successful.
c. The defense bears the burden of proving the defendant’s insanity, often an expensive
proposition.
d. If acquitted, Joe will likely spend less time in a mental facility than in jail or prison.