The biggest concern over the future of behavioral targeting involves its growing ability
to
a. tap into confidential credit card databanks.
b. jam global traffic with billions of unwanted emails.
c. hack into sensitive government websites.
d. track a person’s moves on the Internet.
(Scenario 18-5) Scenario 18-5
An old adage states that all publicity is good publicity. However, Professors Jonah
Berger of the Wharton School, and Alan Sorensen and Scott Rasmussen of Stanford
found that there is such a thing as bad publicity. The colleagues studied the relationship
between bad publicity and its impact on music albums, books, and movies. In 2010,
they published their findings in an article in Marketing Science. After studying cases
involving the late Michael Jackson, Russell Crowe, and various authors, the colleagues
concluded that negative publicity can increase product sales. Michael Jackson sold
more albums after receiving negative media attention, and films starring Russell Crowe
received higher rankings following an incident in which he allegedly threw a cell phone
at a hotel employee. These high-profile stars actually thrived after receiving substantial
amounts of negative publicity. However, in many lower profile cases, negative publicity
hurt sales and product reception. The three colleagues conducted an analysis of The
New York Times’ reviews and book sales and found that negative reviews hurt sales of
books by well-established authors, but helped sales of books by relatively unknown
authors. After conducting their study, the authors found that conventional wisdom is
wrong: not all publicity is good publicity. But they did show that negative publicity can
sometimes be positive; it all depends on existing-product awareness.(Ned Smith, “Can
Bad Buzz Be Good?” Business News Daily, November 1, 2010)
Although it is sometimes unavoidable, one way to prevent negative publicity is to