RATIONALE FOR COOPERATIVE EXAMS
We recognize that allowing students to work cooperatively on an examination takes
getting used to (it’s normally called cheating), especially if you have been testing
students for years in more usual ways. Our premise is simple: if cooperation is
advantageous (as demonstrated in the text), and if group synergy is desirable, then a
system of examination that promotes both cooperation and synergy is not only
philosophically justifiable, it should be enthusiastically encouraged.
Response to Common Objections
I. Won’t cooperating on a test allow loafers to obtain high grades without putting in
any effort to learn? This would be true if there were no accountability factor in the
II. Won’t cooperative tests inflate student grades? Cooperative tests have been used at
Cabrillo College for more than a dozen years by numerous instructors in more than
NOTE: The difficulty of the cooperative exam can always be adjusted by asking
tougher questions if an instructor decides the scores are too high. The accountability
factor can also be adjusted (see explanation of procedure below).
III. Won’t students learn less because they will rely on others to share the burden of
studying? On the contrary, motivated students do not want to risk relying on others