STUDY GUIDE: TWELVE ANGRY MEN
1. Apply the communication competence model to the jury in the movie. Concentrate on
the We-versus-Me orientation, skills and knowledge, appropriateness and effectiveness,
sensitivity, commitment, and ethics.
2. Analyze the jury in the movie as a system. Discuss synergy, negative synergy, ripple
effect, boundary control, group size, and openness versus closedness.
3. Consider this jury from the standpoint of competition and cooperation. Were jurors
competitive? Which ones? Cooperative? Which ones? What were the results? Discuss
each jury member in terms of defensive versus supportive communication. What
resulted from the defensive or supportive communication patterns? Was there an
interdependence in goals and division of labor and resources? Equality? Meaningful
participation? Individual accountability? Did jury members use shift responses?
Support responses? Competitive interrupting? Ambushing? Probing? Paraphrasing?
4. What are some explicit and implicit norms that emerged during jury deliberations? Was
there conformity among jury members?
5. There were difficult group members on the jury. Which ones were difficult? How did
the other jurors handle them? Could they have handled them better (apply text
6. Discuss roles and leadership depicted in the movie. Which informal roles were
exhibited? By whom? With what results? Did leadership emerge according to the
normal pattern in small groups? Explain. Was leadership effective? Which leadership
styles were used? Which were effective and why?
7. Did the jury ever act as a team? Explain your answer. Apply the four dimensions of
empowerment to the jury (group potency, meaningfulness, autonomy, and impact).
8. Did the jury arrive at a true consensus? Explain what is required to have a true
9. Identify significant inferences made by the jury members. Were the inferences faulty?
Explain. Did the jury engage in collective inferential error?
10. Was there groupthink during jury deliberations? Explain. Any dialectical inquiry?
Devil’s advocacy?
11. Apply the Standard Agenda method of decision-making to this jury deliberation. Apply
all 6 steps. Did the jury use all six steps? With what result? Could the jury have