CHAPTER FIVE
Roles and Leadership in Groups
I. Lecture/discussion on roles, explaining emergence of roles, types of roles,
role conflict and role fixation.
II. Show Quiet Rage: The Stanford Prison Study. Available from Philip Zimbardo at
Stanford University (psychology department) An excellent 1992 production with
III. Show excerpt of movie The Doctor (role reversal). Show resident doctors in a
hospital told by the William Hurt character to dress up as patients (end of
movie) and/or William Hurt character as a patient with busy nurses ignoring him
and forcing him to wait. Powerfully illustrates the impact of reversing roles (from
doctor to patient, student to teacher, child to parent).
IV. “Role Expectation, Role Performance” exercise
A. Purposes:
1. To illustrate role expectation can create self-fulfilling prophecies (we
become the role): the power of roles to shape behavior.
2. To demonstrate that role emergence comes from the transactions of
group members and the roles members’ play must be endorsed by
the group.
3. To illustrate hidden agendas.
B. Time required: approximately 35 minutes
C. Instructions:
1. Divide the class into four or five groups (5-6 members works best).
2. Members of two groups will have labels stuck to their foreheads.
These labels will assign roles and dictate the behavior for group
members. Labels (roles) are not revealed to those receiving them.
The labels (file folder labels with sticky backing work best) are:
a. LEADER: follow me
b. ISOLATE: ignore me
3. Members of the remaining groups will receive slips of paper with roles
designated and behavior specified. Members are not to reveal what is on the
slips of paper. Choose from the following:
a. CLOWN: you are a disruptive character. You will goof off, crack
inappropriate jokes, make frequent asides, side-track the group with
irrelevant comments, etc.
c. LEADER: you will run this group. Do not allow other members to
assume the role of leader. Provide direction for group discussion and
bring the group to an eventual decision.
d. ISOLATE: you are bored with this task. You will resist contributing
anything to the discussion. Remain silent unless spoken to directly, and
then answer half-heartedly and with brief responses. Don’t be too obvious.
Simply melt into the background. Don’t be obnoxious, just bored and
uninterested.
4. Have all groups pick a stimulating topic for 10 minutes of discussion (while
the facilitator assigns roles as instructed above), or give groups a
controversial newspaper article or editorial to discuss.
5. Encourage everyone to play their roles with as much accuracy as possible.
D. Processing the exercise:
1. In the labeled groups, have participants (in turn) guess what role they each
thought they were and why they thought that. In the “hidden agenda” roles
groups (slips of paper), have group members try to guess what role each
participant was playing.
2. Discuss the results:
a. Labeled groups usually have several members who become the role
designated, especially isolates, leaders, and clowns. This shows the power of
role labeling and how groups shape roles played by members. If the group
wants you to be an isolate, you will become an isolate because after being
ignored, you will give up and shut up.
b. Interactions among members of groups with hidden roles usually show very
clearly the problem of hidden agendas (personal goals pursued by members
without the group’s knowledge: in this case a specific role planned in advance
of any discussion).
c. Discuss how participants felt during the role playing.
V. “Role Feedback” exercise
A. Purposes:
1. To provide useful feedback from symposium group members.
2. To allow group members to compare how they saw themselves interacting in
the group versus how group members saw them.
B. Time required: about 30 minutes.
C. Instructions:
1. Have class divide into their symposium groups for the last time.
2. Pass out the feedback form below. Have each group member take as many
copies of the feedback form as there are members in their symposium group.
3. Each group member should fill out a form about him or herself then fill out
the form on every other member in their groups.
4. Tell participants not to hand out the finished forms to the appropriate
members until everyone has finished the task, then distribute the forms all at
once. Anonymity is not required but usually works best.
D. Processing the exercise
1. Allow participants to discuss the feedback if they so wish.
2. Encourage all participants to learn from this feedback so they can improve for
their second symposium group in any areas deemed inadequate.
3. Have participants focus on role flexibility versus role fixation.
FEEDBACK FORM
INSTRUCTIONS: Please fill out this feedback form for yourself and each member of
your term group. You may remain anonymous if you wish.
Name of Group Member:___________________
1. The degree of participation was:
Low1 2 3 4 5High
2. How task-oriented (showed interest in meeting group goals) was this person?
Low1 2 3 4 5High
3. How socially oriented (concerned about the relationships among group members)
was this person?
Low1 2 3 4 5High
4. How much influence did this person exert on the group’s decisions?
Low1 2 34 5High
Using the scale above, indicate the degree to which this person played the following
roles:
TASK
_____Initiator-Contributor _____ Coordinator
_____ Information Seeker _____ Secretary-Recorder
_____ Opinion Seeker _____ Director
_____ Information Giver _____ Devil’s Advocate
_____ Clarifier-Elaborator
MAINTENANCE
_____ Supporter-Encourager _____ Gatekeeper-Expediter
_____ Harmonizer-Tension Reliever _____ Feeling Expresser
DISRUPTIVE
_____ Stagehog _____ Fighter-Controller
_____ Isolate _____ Zealot
_____ Clown _____ Cynic
_____ Blocker
VI. Excerpt from the movie, The Breakfast Club
A. Show the segment where the students are left to themselves by the autocratic
teacher and the Judd Nelson character becomes abusive and derisive. End the
segment where the group lies to protect the Judd Nelson character from the abuse
of the teacher (about 15 minute excerpt: from the beginning of the movie).
B. Discuss role emergence in the movie segment, the types of roles played
(especially disruptive roles), the influence of one individual on the group, dealing
with a difficult group member, and the role shifts that occur when the teacher
(outsider) attacks one of the members, even a disruptive member.
VII. Excerpt from the movie, A League of Their Own.
A. This movie tells the story of the first professional women’s baseball league. The
Rockford Peaches coach, Jimmy Dugan (Tom Hanks), is a former professional
baseball player turned drunk. He shows little initial interest in the team, but
eventually he decides to coach them seriously. Show two excerpts from this
movie. First, show the scene where Dugan is berating Evelyn for a throw that
misses the cutoff player (“There’s no crying in baseball”). It begins about
B. These two scenes provide a nice contrast of leadership styles. In the first scene,
Dugan is abusive to Evelyn (emotional incontinence). His memorable line,
“There’s no crying in baseball” applies a leadership style (directive/autocratic)
that fits poorly with his female players. They need encouragement (selling style),
not ridicule. In the second scene Dugan struggles mightily to control
C. These two scenes also show the importance of the social dimension in groups.
Leaders must be cognizant of the interpersonal relations between leader and
followers (coach and players), not merely task driven. Dugan is task oriented in
the first scene and unconscious of the importance of social relations to task
D. Additionally, these two excerpts show the influence followers have on leaders.
Leaders must meet the expectations of followers to lead effectively. Dugan in the
E. There are several additional scenes that can be excerpted from this movie to show
“emotional incontinence” of coach Dugan, autocratic(directive) versus
democratic (participative) leadership styles, and the centrality of competent
communication to effective leadership.
VIII. Lecture/discussion on leadership with special focus on the Hersey and Blanchard
situational leadership model.
IX. An excerpt from the movie, The Dream Team, if this movie is not shown as a
substitute for the Twelve Angry Men exam/paper described earlier, can be shown here
for analysis of informal roles, pattern of leadership emergence, leadership styles,
functional approaches to leadership, and leadership and teambuilding.
A. Begin clip about two-thirds into the film. The Dream Team members are looking
for their psychiatrist, Dr. Weitzman. They enter a hospital. Finish the movie from
this point: about 45 minutes total. A shorter clip (last 20 minutes of film),
beginning with all four team members in jail, could be used if desired.
B. Distribute a list of questions for group members to answer as they view the video
clip. Suggested questions:
1. Which specific informal rules (e.g., information-giver, stagehog, harmonizer)
do Dream Team members play? What are the results? Any role fixation?
2. Billy emerges as team leader. Does this emergence follow closely the
INFORMAL ROLES
Task Roles
1. Initiator-Contributor: Offers ideas; proposes solutions
2. Information Seeker: Solicits clarification, ideas, and evidence
3. Opinion-Seeker: Requests viewpoints from others
4. Information Giver: Provides relevant and significant information
Maintenance Roles
1. Supporter-Encourager: Provides praise and encouragement
2. Harmonizer-Tension Reliever: Reduces tension through humor/smoothing
Disruptive Roles
1. Stagehog: Monopolizes conversation
PATTERN OF LEADER EMERGENCE
General Pattern (Process of Elimination)
Phase One
Quiet members eliminated
Members who express strong, unqualified assertions eliminated
Uninformed, unintelligent, and/or unskilled eliminated
Phase Two, part one
Bossy, dictatorial members eliminated
Phase Two, part two
Member who provides solution in crisis considered for leader
Member who exhibits effective listening skills considered for
leader
Member who acquires a lieutenant considered for leader
If more than one member acquires lieutenant, possible stalemate
How to Become Leader
Manifest conformity to group norms, values, and goals
Display proper motivation to lead
Avoid the “thou shalt nots”
Modifying Factors of Leader Emergence
Gender bias
Ethnic bias
PERSPECTIVES ON
LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS
TRAITS PERSPECTIVE (necessary but not sufficient leadership traits)
Verbal Skills
Social Skills
Modicum of Intelligence
STYLES PERSPECTIVE
Autocratic (Directive)
Democratic (Participative)
Laissez Faire (Sit on your Derriere)
SITUATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
Telling Style: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :– Readiness level
FUNCTIONAL PERSPECTIVE
Vital Functions
Leader As Completer (“Leadership is a process, not a person”)
COMMUNICATION COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVE
“Extraordinary leadership requires extraordinary communication”
“Effective leadership is an adaptive process”