8. The only clear finding from several decades of empirical research into the outcomes of mergers and
acquisitions is that the shareholders of the acquiring firms lose money.
[See p.400
9. Identifying the strategic rationale and likely benefits of mergers and acquisitions is easier in the case of
diversifying mergers and acquisitions than for horizontal mergers and acquisitions.
[See p.401
10. In order to gain a new organizational capability, it is usually cheaper and less risky to acquire a
company that already possesses that capability than to develop that capability internally.
[See p.397]
11. The “lemons problem” in the market for companies refers to the fact that the sellers of companies have
better information about the company than do would-be buyers.
[See p.398]
12. Cross-border acquisitions tend to have the strongest strategic logic, but give rise to the greatest
challenges of post-merger integration.
[See p.398]
13. Issues of pre-acquisition planning and post-acquisition management should be viewed as separate:
activities best led by separate teams.
[See pp.398-399]
14. The key lesson to be drawn from the failures that Hewlett-Packard has experienced in acquiring
software and services companies EDS and Autonomy is that acquisitions that aim to change a company’s
business model are more risky than acquisitions that seek to leverage the existing business model.
[See p.399]
15. The concentration of Hollywood film industry in Los Angeles and electronics and IT companies in
Silicon Valley is for different reasons than those which created the industrial districts of Italy.
[See p.401]