CHAPTER 6 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 87
Fact Pattern 6-2 (Questions 33-34 apply)
Officials of the town of Sunnyville were concerned about the number of dogs running loose. They
set up a new administrative agency called “Dog Control.” The new agency issued a regulation that
all dogs must be on leash in public. Tony who had moved to Sunnyville in the previous month did
not own a dog and had no plans to get one. He, however, thought the regulation was outrageous and
decided to sue on the basis that it was not validly enacted. Mona, another resident, was also
concerned about the law. She rents a home with a fence in the backyard that was in public view.
She was concerned that the regulation would be applied to her dogs while in the fenced area. She
decided to bring a preemptive strike and sue the city for revocation of the regulation before the city
could sue her. Both Tony and Mona rush to file suit before the city has a chance to take any action
to enforce the new rule.
33. Refer to fact pattern 6-2. Which of the following is the best defense the city has against the lawsuit
brought by Tony?
A. That Tony lacks standing to sue.
B. That courts have no authority to determine the validity of agency rules.
C. That Tony lacks permission of the agency to sue since authorization of the agency is required
prior to a lawsuit challenging the validity of an agency regulation.
D. That Tony has not lived in the jurisdiction for at least a year since residence in the jurisdiction
for at least a year is required in order to challenge the validity of a local regulation.
34. Refer to fact pattern 6-2. Of the following arguments, which is the best for the city to raise in the
lawsuit brought by Mona?
A. That courts have no authority to determine the validity of agency regulations.
B. That the issue is nor ripe for determination.
C. That Mona must be a property owner in the jurisdiction in order to challenge the agency
regulation.
D. That Mona is guilty of self incrimination.
35. Brianna is in charge of new federal agency set up to monitor farming operations. The agency wishes
to institute a rule regarding the use of pesticides. Brianna tells her associates to publish the proposed
rule but to decline taking comments on the rule because she does not want to deal with unhappy
farmers. Assuming you are legal counsel to the agency, what would you tell Brianna regarding her
plan to refuse comments on the proposed rule?
A. That her plan is a bad one because the Administrative Procedure Act requires that the public be
given an opportunity to comment before a federal agency can promulgate a rule.
B. That her plan is a bad one because while the Administrative Procedure Act does not generally
require that the public be given an opportunity to comment, it does require that agencies take public
comments when food safety is involved.