StubHub
StubHub, the internet ticket exchange website, was created in 2000 by Jeff Fluhr and Eric Baker
out of their Stanford dorm rooms as an alternative to ticket scalping at venue sites. The founders’
original premise—that a full stadium or arena is better than one that is sold out but poorly
attended—helped StubHub quickly sign contracts with the four major U.S. professional sports
organizations. By offering a venue location (albeit electronic) where season-ticket holders could safely
sell their tickets, StubHub quickly attracted customers.
StubHub then moved into direct consumer marketing by facilitating ticket sales between any two
willing parties including guaranteed delivery through FedEx. StubHub quickly became the second
largest ticket resale auction site, with 2.1 million unique visitors per month and over $100 million in
annual revenue. StubHub’s success naturally attracted competition, and their unique position within
the market began to erode. At the same time, industry powerhouse Ticketmaster began lobbying to
have states outlaw the reselling of tickets for more than their face value.
With rising competition, a business model that was growing obsolete, and the probability of
weakening revenues, StubHub needed a new strategy for growth and profit. Several options present
themselves. First, StubHub could offer advertising space on its site for sporting and theatrical events.
Internet advertising has been the number one revenue generating system for profitable internet
ventures. Google, for example, projects advertising revenues in excess of $26 billion by 2009, and
worldwide ad revenue is expected to increase by over 20% per year in the foreseeable future. StubHub
has avoided this avenue in the past, but with more companies looking to market to its clientele, it has
gradually expanded in this direction.
While StubHub could contract with event sites to sell tickets for them, attempting to undercut
Ticketmaster would be difficult. Most venues would not be eager to pay the same percentage
commission those individuals selling tickets would, and StubHub has no resource-based advantages
over Ticketmaster. This strategy is not a part of StubHub’s current model and would be difficult to
implement. Attacking an entrenched provider is usually a recipe for high expense and low returns.
StubHub’s unique buy/sell/guaranteed delivery method makes expansion of the auction a distinct
possibility. Apparently eBay thought so too, because they bought StubHub in January 2007 for $310
million to replace its own failing ticket resale site (marketplace). Being acquired by eBay gave
StubHub a large cash infusion that boosts many of StubHub’s weaker areas, like access to talent and
experience, established platform, and well, cash.
The infusion of capital from the eBay deal presents a fourth option: StubHub could begin buying
tickets in bulk and then auctioning them off itself. The new system would function similar to the stock
exchange, which might substantially increase site traffic. The necessary information would be readily
accessible, and though StubHub does not currently have the expertise to manage the risks and returns,
that could be acquired. This market is currently unfilled, making it a plausible avenue for expansion.
150. Refer to StubHub. With so many companies able to duplicate the services that it produces, StubHub
clearly_____.
does not have a sustainable competitive advantage
uses strategic reference points to chart its growth
has imperfectly imitable resources
uses benchmarking as its primary competitive advantage
must have a particularly strong distinctive competence