Furthermore, Ford’s Premium Automotive Group (PAG), which manufactures their luxury
Jaguar, Aston Martin, Land Rover, and Volvo brands, has been consistently losing billions of dollars
year after year. Although the company has substantial cash reserves—over $20 billion—operating
losses were steadily diminishing the company’s financial safety net. Chris Bolen, Ford’s
manufacturing director said, “We took our eye off the ball and got intoxicated with just making
trucks…internally we ignored a lot of waste…we let manufacturing get in trouble.”
This was the situation Alan Mulally found himself in when he took over as the new Ford CEO
in 2006. As Mulally stated, “Our number one priority is to restructure ourselves in the near term.” In
the interest of curbing losses and increasing their manufacturing efficiency, Ford needed effective
strategic planning to save their company.
At this juncture, four particular options presented themselves. First, Ford could close older
plants to cut production costs and excess manufacturing, but it would also raise issues regarding
employee layoffs. The second option would involve cutting back on SUV and truck manufacturing to
focus on smaller, more fuel-efficient cars. Third, Ford could reduce its North American presence to
focus on their more successful markets in Europe, South America, and China. In doing so, however,
Ford would essentially be abandoning its home market. Finally, Ford could sell the PAG group,
returning their focus to the cars that have traditionally been their area of expertise.
Mulally began by reducing dependence on large trucks and SUVs and aggressively closing
plants. Seven plants will close by 2010, and more than 30,000 jobs were eliminated in the past year. In
March 2007, Ford sold the majority stake in Aston-Martin to an investment consortium. Reducing
personnel costs has been a priority as well; Ford’s profit gap is over $2,400 per vehicle with roughly
$1,000 to 1,300 coming from labor. Actively working with the United Auto Workers labor union, Ford
has renegotiated agreements with 33 of its 41 US factories to achieve more flexible rules and timing
and reduce embedded expenses.
Mulally has moved to improve communication levels and commitment throughout the
organization. Many of these policies are new to Ford, but Mulally hopes to match the practices used by
Toyota and others in a continuous improvement system that should help the company move towards
increased sales, reduced costs, and improved quality.
156. Refer to Ford. How can Ford benefit from planning?
Planning encourages employees to engage in behaviors directly related to goal
accomplishment.
Planning encourages employees to work harder for extended periods of time.
Planning encourages the development of task strategies.
Planning benefits both companies and individuals.
Planning does all of the above.
157. Refer to Ford. Unfortunately, for Ford planning is not a cure-all. Which of the following best describes
potential problems associated with planning?
the acceptance of satisficing solutions
a false sense of certainty based on faulty assumptions
the inability of organizational line personnel to accept the long-term benefit of planning
the requirement for expensive employee training before plans can be effectively
implemented