34. A colleague of yours frequently takes for his own personal use small amounts of office supplies, noting that
the loss to the company is minimal. You counter that if everyone were to take the office supplies, the loss
would no longer be minimal. Your rationale expresses which historical ethical principle?
A) the “No free lunch” rule
B) the Risk Aversion Principle
C) the Golden Rule
D) Kant’s Categorical Imperative
35. Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative states that
A) one should take the action that produces the least harm or incurs the least cost.
B) if an action is not right for everyone to take, it is not right for anyone to take.
C) one can put values in rank order and understand the consequences of various courses of action.
D) if an action cannot be taken repeatedly, then it is not right to be taken at any time.
36. A classic ethical dilemma is the hypothetical case of a man stealing from a grocery store in order to feed his
starving family. If you used the Utilitarian Principle to evaluate this situation, you might argue that stealing
the food is
A) wrong, because if everyone were to do this, the concept of personal property is defeated.
B) acceptable, because the higher value is the survival of the family.
C) acceptable, because the grocer suffers the least harm.
D) wrong, because the man would not want the grocer to steal from him.