PETA has been known to use pretty crude tactics to get its point across. For instance, PETA
successfully launched a six-year campaign of intimidation against a farm that bread guinea pigs for
scientific research, with strategies including hate mail, malicious phone calls, death threats, arson, car
vandalism, and a pedophile smear campaign. Clearly PETA will do anything to achieve its goals. Even
large international companies like McDonald’s, Burger King, and KFC have responded to pressure
from PETA by issuing and enforcing strict animal handling guidelines to their meat suppliers. The
“Died” campaign against P&G, based on P&G’s Tide laundry detergent, shows a woman holding a
box of “Died” detergent with the words “Thousands of Animals Died for Your Laundry.” PETA has
encouraged consumers to boycott all P&G products until the company ends all forms of animal testing.
Companies like P&G have both an ethical and legal obligation to ensure the safety of their
products for consumer use and consumption. Many such companies, including P&G, have invested
heavily in exploring alternatives to using animals for product safety testing; however, these
technologies are not sophisticated enough to completely replace animal testing. Consequently, entirely
eliminating animal testing would be imprudent and negligent. P&G continues to use animal testing but
only when absolutely necessary.
Though groups like PETA have an influence over P&G’s practices, their interactions with the
company are limited and irregular. P&G’s primary responsibilities lie with groups like shareholders,
customers, and employees. The potential threats and damages to the company such as lawsuits and
unsafe products that might result from the elimination of animal testing would have a much greater
effect on customer confidence, shareholder stakes, and employee job security.
With regards to PETA, legally all P&G would have to do is make sure that no animal abuse occurs
in its product testing. It is already doing this, and in fact is going further, by exploring ways to further
eliminate the need for animal testing. In addition to its own programs, P&G also funds independent
agencies and institutions that are experimenting with alternative approaches.
130. Refer to P&G and PETA. PETA more than likely sees greater _____ than P&G’s research and
development department when making decisions involving animals.
131. Refer to P&G and PETA. PETA apparently expects all for-profit organizations to adhere to the:
principle of long-term self interest
principle of utilitarian requirements
principle of distributive justice
principle of community injunctions
principle of personal virtue