82) A men’s high school basketball team has a strong incentive to win because each player will
be awarded a scholarship if the team can win the conference tournament. The trouble is every
player is less than 6 feet tall, and the team has lost almost all of its previous games. What is true
about this team’s likely level of motivation?
A) Valence is high because the scholarship reward is meaningful. Instrumentality is high because
players believe they will receive the reward if they perform. Expectancy is low because there is
little chance that the team will win. Because expectancy is low, motivation is likely to be low.
B) Valence is high because the scholarship reward is meaningful. Instrumentality is high because
players believe they will receive the reward if they perform. Expectancy is low because, being so
short, there is little chance that the team will win. Because expectancy is low, motivation is
likely to be high.
C) Valence is low because the scholarship reward is not meaningful. Instrumentality is high
because players believe they will receive the reward if they perform. Expectancy is high because,
being so short, there is a good chance that the team will win. Because expectancy is high,
motivation is likely to be high.
D) Valence is low because the scholarship reward is not meaningful. Instrumentality is low
because players do not believe they will receive the reward if they perform. Expectancy is low
because, being so short, there is little chance that the team will win. Because all three categories
are low, motivation is likely to be low.
83) In tennis, Moncef is carrying out a regime to improve his mobility by 25% in the next eight
weeks. Does Moncef have SMART goals?
A) Yes, because Moncef’s goals are specific (mobility), measurable (25%), achievable (with
practice), results-based (realistic goal), and time-specific (8 weeks).
B) Yes, because Moncef’s goals are specific (25%), measurable (mobility), achievable (with
practice), results-based (realistic goal), and time-specific (8 weeks).
C) No, because the goals are not time-specific. Eight weeks is too vague a time frame to be
specific.
D) No, because the goals are not measurable. There is no way to measure whether a person’s
mobility in tennis has improved by 25%.