374 MANAGERS AND THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT
D. Matthew can reaffirm the debt to Rick but only up to 50% of the maximum amount owed, and
the bankruptcy judge has the authority to disapprove of the agreement if the court finds that it is not
in Matthew’s best interest.
35. Bob goes bankrupt. He has several creditors and a small amount in savings. He owes XYZ Bank
$200,000 for which he used his home as collateral. XYZ Bank properly perfected its interest in the
home. Bob additionally owes $3,000 in alimony to an ex-wife, Sue; $50,000 in unsecured credit
card bills; and $5,000 in unsecured debt to his friend Tina. After all exemptions are satisfied,
$205,000 from the sale of the home and $5,000 in a small bank account remain for distribution to
creditors. Which of the following is true regarding priority?
A. All funds are added together and disbursed to the claimants based upon the percentage of each
creditor’s claim.
B. Tina has first priority, the credit card companies are then paid, and XYZ Bank is entitled to any
remainder.
C. XYZ Bank receives $200,000 from the sale of the home, Sue receives $3,000, and the remainder
is divided between the credit card companies and Tina.
D. Tina has first priority, XYZ Bank is then paid, and the credit card companies divide the
remainder.
36. Alice, the president of ABC Bank, had a meeting with Fred to discuss the fact that he was having
difficulty making the payments on his loan that was guaranteed by Sylvia. Fred requested that Alice
provide a grace period to Fred and allow him to miss a few payments without penalty in order to
catch up his finances. Alice had no objection. Assuming the guaranty agreement did not address
such situations, is Alice acting prudently and why or why not?
A. Yes, because Sylvia, as a guarantor, has no rights to oppose any action of the bank.
B. Yes, because while Sylvia has certain rights in regard to actions taken by the bank, she had no
right to oppose the provision of a grace period since it is unlikely that allowing such a grace period
would impair Sylvia’s interests.
C. No, because Alice should have obtained the written consent of Sylvia in the form of an
affirmation of the guaranty in view of the grace period.
D. No, because as a matter of equitable business practice, Alice should have put Sylvia on notice
although Alice did not increase the bank’s exposure by failing to do so.
ESSAY QUESTIONS
1. What is required in a filing for a voluntary petition in bankruptcy? An involuntary petition?