MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
1. Compared with standard linear programming algorithms, those
for treating integer linear programming problems usually are:
a. less complex due to fewer possible solutions.
b. less amenable to “what if” analysis.
c. always heuristic.
d. easier to formulate.
2. In the branch-and-bound technique for solving integer linear
programming models with a maximization objective function:
a. Once a feasible solution is found, it is optimal.
b. If the solution generated at one stage is X1 = 5.7, X2 = 3
but gives an objective function value higher than that
of the best integer solution found to date, X2 must be
either 0, 1, or 2 in the optimal solution.
c. If the solution generated at one stage is X1 = 5.7, X2 = 3
but gives an objective function value higher than that
of the best integer solution found to date, a new linear
programming problem is solved with two constraints
added: X1 6 and X1 5.
d. If the solution generated at one stage is X1 = 5.7, X2 = 3
but gives an objective function value higher than that
of the best integer solution found to date, two new
linear programs are solved, one with the constraint
X1 6 added, the other with the constraint X1 5 added.
3. In solving an integer linear programming problem, lifting the
integer requirements and first solving the underlying standard
linear programming problem:
a. never yields an optimal solution.
b. is not part of the branch-and-bound technique.
c. is not part of the cutting plane technique.
d. may yield an integer-valued solution.
4. When compared with standard linear programming, integer linear
programming typically has:
a. more feasible solution points to evaluate.
b. fewer feasible solution points to evaluate.
c. the same number of feasible solution points to evaluate.
d. more linear constraints.