High litigation costs, delays in the court system, and damage to employer–employee relationships have
prompted growth in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods such as arbitration, peer review panels,
ombuds, and mediation.
1. Arbitration: Arbitration is a process that uses a neutral third party to make a binding decision, thereby
eliminating the need to involve the court. Arbitration has been a common feature in union contracts. However,
it must be set up carefully if employers want to use it in union-free situations. Since employers often select the
arbitrators, and because arbitrators may not be required to issue written decisions and opinions, some see the
use of arbitration in employment-related situations as unfair.
2. Peer review panels: Some companies allow their employees to appeal disciplinary actions to an internal
committee of employees. This panel reviews the actions and makes recommendations or decisions. Peer
review panels use fellow employees and perhaps a few managers to resolve employment disputes. Panel
members are specially trained volunteers who sign confidentiality agreements, after which the company
assigns them to hear appeals.
3. Ombuds: Some organizations ensure process fairness through ombuds—individuals outside the normal
chain of command who act as independent problem solvers for both management and employees. At many
large- and medium-sized firms, ombuds have effectively addressed complaints about unfair treatment,
employee–supervisor conflicts, and other workplace behavior issues. Ombuds address employees’ complaints
and operate with a high degree of confidentiality; they also can improve employee perceptions of procedural
justice.
4. Mediation: Ombuds, as well as other individuals and groups who oversee disputes, will sometimes use
mediation as a tool for developing appropriate and fair outcomes for all parties involved. Mediators may use
either a facilitative or evaluative approach to dispute resolution. Facilitative techniques foster communication
among the parties to help uncover options for settling. Evaluative techniques, on the other hand, point out the
potential weaknesses in each side’s case and offer potential settlement options. Many mediators use a
combination of those approaches depending on the circumstances of the dispute.