CHAPTER 11 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 165
Fact Pattern 11-1 (Questions 31–32 apply)
Samantha develops a new type of comb that effectively removes loose dog hair and eliminates
problems with shedding. Samantha had never seen such a comb on the market and was very
surprised when she received notification that she was being sued for patent infringement by the
holder of a patent on a similar type of comb. Samantha investigates and determines that the earlier
patent was valid. Her friend Harry, a first year law student told her that she could not be guilty of
patent infringement because she was not aware of the earlier patent, and that she should proceed to at
least sell the rest of her inventory.
31. Refer to fact pattern 11-1. Assuming the validity of the earlier patent, which of the following is true
regarding Harry’s statement that Samantha could not be guilty of patent infringement because she
was unaware of the earlier patent when she began marketing her combs?
A. Harry was correct.
B. Harry was incorrect, and Samantha can be held liable for direct patent infringement.
C. Harry was incorrect, and Samantha can be held liable for indirect patent infringement.
D. Harry was incorrect, and Samantha can be held liable for contributory patent infringement.
32. Refer to fact pattern 11-1. Assuming the validity of the earlier patent, which of the following is true
regarding Samantha’s rights to legally continue selling the combs?
A. She should stop selling the combs immediately.
B. She may continue selling the combs until she sells the rest of her inventory, but she must then
stop.
C. Since she was not aware of the earlier patent when she started marketing her combs, she can
continue to sell the combs indefinitely without providing any royalties to the holder of the initial
patent.
D. Since she was not aware of the earlier patent when she started marketing her combs, she can
continue to sell the combs indefinitely, but she must pay reasonable royalties to the holder of the
initial patent.
Fact Pattern 11-2 (Questions 33-34 apply)
Professor Peter enjoys using a small manual containing information on employment laws in his
business law class. The manual costs $100 and is published by We Publish book publishers.
Because Professor Peter wants to save his students some money, he copies the manual and has ABC
Copy Store make copies for students. Students are required to purchase the copies directly from the
copy store. Professor Prudence, who dislikes Peter because she believes he blocked her tenure
application, hears about the deal and notifies the publishing company. The publishing company
demands that the process be stopped and prepares to seek damages.