Another serious problem came to light when the California Office of Statewide Health
Planning and Development determined that Kaiser had 5 of the 28 hospitals with the highest
pneumonia death rates in the state. Though pneumonia is the sixth-leading cause of death in the U.S.,
timely diagnosis and treatment can greatly reduce patient mortality rates. A well-run hospital should
not have these kinds of problems treating pneumonia, which indicate that the hospital’s medical
control processes are breaking down.
Implementing work teams could help Kaiser identify and respond to its managerial and patient
care problems. Kaiser’s problems are both complex and require the involvement of many different
employee groups, such as doctors, nurses, office personnel, and lab techs. Other hospitals have had
success with work teams, and Kaiser might benefit from similar programs. Baptist Memphis Hospital
in Memphis, Tennessee empowered Rapid Response Teams to decide to call in the Medical
Emergency Team if a patient’s condition worsened. As a result, the number of cardiac arrests dropped
by 26 percent, and the survival rate doubled from 13 to 26 percent.
Stanford University Hospital created Patient-Centered Care Teams to manage everything from
admission to discharge and Process-Centered Care Teams to identify hospital processes and make
them more efficient and effective. Kaiser could benefit from teams such as these. Team members
should also be involved in setting team goals, and rewards should be based on both individual and
team performance. Team members should also receive training in interpersonal skills.
If teams are not assigned a leader one might naturally emerge, but once the team reaches
performing stage, it is best if leadership responsibilities are shared among team members. If teams are
to truly be self-managing, management must also give them a relatively high level of bureaucratic
immunity. The structure of the team, its size, and its level of autonomy should generally depend on the
task at hand. Cohesiveness is important too, and Kaiser can build team cohesiveness by making
employees feel that they are part of an organization that cares about its patients and by making
employees believe that what they do on their jobs makes a difference in the lives of others. The Kaiser
story is an ongoing saga and more information about the successes of Kaiser (or lack thereof) might
come to light as you are reading this case and analysis.
107. Refer to Kaiser Permanente. Which of the following is a potential disadvantage that Kaiser
Permanente needs to address before setting up its teams?
the absence of a commitment to finding an ideal solution
initially high employee turnover
lack of creativity in decision making
decreased employee satisfaction as a result of team membership
108. Refer to Kaiser Permanente. Teams at Kaiser Permanente will vary in terms of autonomy. This
means that teams will:
not have the same group norms
vary in terms of deep-level and surface-level diversity
vary in how will the members get along with one another
have different degrees of independence in making decisions about how to accomplish their
goals
all have different stretch goals
109. Refer to Kaiser Permanente. Which of the following is one of the factors that Kaiser Permanente
should consider when selecting people who are suited for teamwork or for working on a particular
team?