CaseScenario3:Bunnywac.
Bunnywac is a global producer and seller of batteries for consumer electronics products
(radios, flashlights, toys, etc.), and competes primarily with its larger rivals by
providing battery products equal in performance at a lower price. The worldwide
battery industry suffers from issues of overcapacity and commoditization, brand
segmentation and proliferation, the growing strength of global retailers, and the
low-cost threat of new entrants from Asia. Thus, the ability to provide dependable
batteries at a very low cost is essential to survival in this industry. Bunnywac has grown
quickly into one of the leading players in the battery industry primary through
horizontal acquisitions financed by a recent successful IPO, and is now counted among
the top four companies in North and Latin America. Its presence in Europe and Latin
America is negligible. While its market presence and brand is generally strong and
market share is growing, Bunnywac has entered into an alliance to obtain the core
technologies of its batteries. Bunnywac does not actually own the technology that
makes its batteries work. This approach has provided Bunnywac a cost advantage since
it has not had to invest in basic R&D and has very little R&D infrastructure.
This technology is licensed from Mats (which has 200 engineers dedicated to moving
the technology forward), one of Japan’s largest technology-based holding companies
(like Sharp or Canon). Mats also sells batteries under the Pandemonium brand and
commands over 50 percent of the market share of Asian countries. Mats’ market share
in other global markets is negligible and its efforts at growing its branded battery share
in the North America, Latin America, and Europe has been severely frustrated in recent
years. While Mats is very large compared to Bunnywac, the battery technology and
battery business are relatively tiny relative to Mats’ other technology-based businesses.
Bunnywac’s decade-long licensing agreement with Mats for the essential battery
technology expires in 1 year; there are no obvious substitute providers of this
technology.
What should Bunnywac’s strategy be with regard to the lapsing technology contract?
A. vertical business-level complementary strategic alliance
B. horizontal business-level complementary strategic alliance
C. competition-reducing business-level strategic alliance
D. competition response business-level strategic alliance