c) Pepsi in beverages
d) Subway in sandwich fast food
e) Levis in denim jeans
Which of the following conclusions can we make about vertical integration with
regards to asset specificity?
a) If asset specificity is significant enough, vertical integration will be more profitable
than arm’s-length market purchases, even when production of the input is characterized
by strong scale economies or when the firm’s product market scale is small.
b) A firm gains more from vertical integration when outside market specialists are better
able to take advantage of economies of scale and scope
c) A firm with a larger share of the product market will benefit more from vertical
integration than a firm with a smaller share of the product market
d) The more a firm produces, the greater its input and this ultimately decreases the
likelihood that in-house production can take as much advantage of economies of scale
and scope as an outside market specialist
e) If a firm is considering whether to make or buy an input requiring significant
up-front setup costs, and there is a large market outside the firm for the input, then the
firm should buy the input from outside market specialists
What situation occurs when a large incumbent sets a low price to drive smaller rivals
from the market?